ORGANIZATIONS: THE CHALLENGE OF TRANSFORMATION
"We do not live in homogeneous communities,
nor should we aspire to emphatic units or absolute consensus. These are
impossible things and even if only for that reason, situations that make no
sense to wish for". Daniel Innerarity
affirmed this in his article on "The society of gaps" (La Vanguardia,
04/30/22).
This reflection suggests me to
think of organizations as communities: we cannot expect organizations to be
calm systems where absolute consensuses are given. This idea, however,
becomes a greater challenge in entities that focus on working with
participatory and democratic organizational models: management models that are
based on shared decision-making, distribution and democratization of power,
self-management, and self-organization between other characteristics.
In any organization, there are
different points of view regarding how to do things, which are the best
decisions to make, which are the ways in which we should relate... These
differences are intrinsic to each of the people who built the organizations, because
of one's own life experiences, because of culture, because of training, because
of interests...
It is said that in diversity there
is the wealth, but perhaps it would be more appropriate to say that in
diversity there is the potential for wealth. And as with any potential
there is also the challenge.
Generalizing is always
dangerous, but in organizations governed by hierarchical organizational models,
this diversity will be neither a risk nor an opportunity or potential: it will
not be a risk since people are "not expected" to develop their full
potential and differences to contribute to the organization's purpose, instead everyone
is expected to "do what they have to do". Sometimes even, looking
for standardize and minimize the differences between people as much as
possible, so that the organization always responds the same way no matter who
is there at that moment.
However, we are in a time of
great challenges, in an environment of complexity, uncertainty and more than
speed, we are living in a time of acceleration.
We read, we see, we feel, we
experience constant changes and a high need for adaptability, flexibility, resilience,
and agility... At a work level, it seems as if these constant changes, needs,
opportunities, challenges dump us into a unsustainable way of work... and the
most worrying thing is that mostly we don't know how to slow it down... (lately
I tend to remember (or remind myself) that "let's not forget that meanwhile
we are living")
My feeling, although sometime
feelings are not scientific and therefore can give little confidence, is that
we are approaching to the end of an era about the way we work, and we don't
know yet which will be the next one.
In this "we don't
know" it is probably because the new organizational experiences that
already exist or are being born, are in the process of becoming, without being conscious
of the need to exist. But I have to tell you that they already exist.
These new organizational
experiences appear as a response of a need to work differently, but it is still
difficult to "model" what type of organization they are or will
become.
In the society of the 21st
century, with the changes and disruptions we have experienced and that we will
experience, organizations will have to become different.
To keep moving forward on this
way, we need people, organizations, even legislative frameworks, who push
towards change. At the same time, we also need to have to take care to make it tangible,
to order it, and to work with methodology, when possible. We must focus that
the transformation of organizational model’s root fastly, clearly and firmly,
and that the rain and wind we are encountering contribute to watering and
growing it, rather than putting it in danger of disappearing.
To close this little
reflection, I take again a paragraph from the article that inspired and in says:
" The type of
government that this society of the gaps is requiring demands a broad view, an
overall vision, a new institutional and organizational culture."
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario